AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Low 26 Monero

fix mweb fee provider

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by Julian

28/100 · Opaque
fix mweb fee provider
✓ Subject identifies a change! No meaningful explanatory body
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit fixes a small but meaningful mix-up in the mobile wallet's send screen. The code was reading the desktop fee-rate setting when preparing a Litecoin MWEB (privacy) transaction, instead of reading the mobile fee-rate setting. If the two settings differ, the user could end up paying an unexpected fee, or the transaction might not be built with the fee they actually selected on their phone. There is no direct evidence in the commit of funds being stolen or a remote attacker being able to exploit this.

Recommended action

Treat as a functional bug with possible fee/reliability side effects. Review whether the same provider mismatch exists in other mobile send paths or other MWEB-related flows. Add regression tests covering fee-rate selection for MWEB sends on mobile. No urgent security patch is indicated by the diff alone, but the fix should be included in the next release.

Security signals we found

01

State provider mismatch between desktop and mobile fee-rate settings

02

MWEB (privacy transaction) fee calculation affected

03

Single-line fix with no additional tests or validation

04

No explicit security framing by the vendor in commit title or message

Risk score

Why this scored 26/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 5/30
Exploitability 5/25
Stealth signal 5/15
Affected reach 5/15
Confidence 4/10
Evidence quality 2/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.