AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Informational 16 Monero

feat(shopinbit): add ShopInBit offer review and shipping address views

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by sneurlax

62/100 · Adequate
feat(shopinbit): add ShopInBit offer review and shipping address views
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Uses a recognizable type or scope! No meaningful explanatory body
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit adds two new screens to the Stack Wallet app for a third-party shopping service called ShopInBit: one screen lets users review a purchase offer, and another lets them enter a shipping address. The code itself is a normal feature addition, but it does a few things that could matter for security and privacy: it sends the user's shipping address (name, street, city, postal code, country) to ShopInBit's servers, it silently ignores server errors and continues to the payment screen anyway, and it splits the full name into first/last name in a crude way. There is no sign in the commit that this is described as a security fix or that any vulnerability was reported.

Recommended action

Treat this as a routine feature commit, not a security patch. If reviewing for release, consider: adding explicit user consent/disclosure before transmitting shipping PII; validating and sanitizing shipping fields; handling `submitAddress` failures with user-visible messaging instead of silently proceeding; hardening the name-splitting logic; and adding null-safety checks on API country labels. No immediate incident response is indicated by the diff.

Security signals we found

01

Collection and network transmission of PII (shipping address, full name) to a third-party service

02

Silent swallowing of network/parse exceptions in `_loadOffer`, `_fetchCountries`, and `_continue`

03

Continues to payment screen even when `submitAddress` returns an error or throws

04

Crude name parsing: `parts.sublist(1).join(' ')` can produce empty last name

05

No input validation beyond non-empty checks on shipping fields

06

No security relevance claimed by commit message or diff

Risk score

Why this scored 16/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 2/30
Exploitability 2/25
Stealth signal 1/15
Affected reach 3/15
Confidence 6/10
Evidence quality 2/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.