What changed, and why it matters
This commit only fixes three comments in the source code: two replace the word 'he' with 'they' for inclusive language, and one corrects 'dont' to 'don't'. No executable code, logic, or security behavior was changed.
No security action needed. This is a cosmetic/documentation cleanup.
Security signals we found
No strong security signals were identified.
Evidence from the diff
The diff is limited to comment-only changes in src/apps/wallets/manager.py and src/hosts/usb.py. There are no functional modifications to signing flows, sighash handling, USB host parsing, or file I/O. The code paths and behavior remain identical.
Changed components
Inspect captured patch +3 / −3
diff --git a/src/apps/wallets/manager.py b/src/apps/wallets/manager.py
index e80ce81..2500a74 100644
--- a/src/apps/wallets/manager.py
+++ b/src/apps/wallets/manager.py
@@ -329,7 +329,7 @@ class WalletManager(BaseApp):
Returns dict with options to pass to sign_psbtview function.
"""
- # ask the user if he wants to sign with custom sighashes
+ # ask the user if they want to sign with custom sighashes
sighash = await self.confirm_sighashes(meta, show_screen)
if sighash == False:
return
@@ -406,7 +406,7 @@ class WalletManager(BaseApp):
if not used_custom_sighashes:
return None
- # ask the user if he wants to sign in case of non-default sighashes
+ # ask the user if they want to sign in case of non-default sighashes
custom_sighashes = [
("Input %d: %s" % (i, inp.get("sighash", sighash_name)))
for (i, inp) in enumerate(meta["inputs"])
diff --git a/src/hosts/usb.py b/src/hosts/usb.py
index b4101ba..9566d56 100644
--- a/src/hosts/usb.py
+++ b/src/hosts/usb.py
@@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ class USBHost(Host):
# if not - create new file on the ramdisk
if self.f is None:
self.f = open(self.path + "/data", "wb")
- # check if we dont have EOL in the data
+ # check if we don't have EOL in the data
if b"\n" not in res and b"\r" not in res:
self.f.write(res)
return
Why this scored 15/100
Community notes
Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.
The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.