AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Low 34 Bitcoin

confirm the passphrase in the wallet-level and terminal seed imports

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by Craig Raw

50/100 · Thin
confirm the passphrase in the wallet-level and terminal seed imports
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component! No meaningful explanatory body
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit adds a 'confirm your passphrase' step when importing a Bitcoin wallet seed in two places: the desktop wallet import screen and the terminal/command-line wallet creation. Previously, if a user typed a BIP39 passphrase (the extra password that unlocks a hidden wallet) with a typo, Sparrow would silently create a different wallet. The user might then send funds to addresses they do not actually control or cannot later reproduce. The fix forces the user to type the passphrase twice so typos are caught immediately.

Recommended action

Users importing BIP39 seeds with a passphrase should upgrade to the version containing this commit to avoid accidental wallet derivation from typos. Developers should review whether other passphrase entry points (e.g., hardware wallet unlock, wallet loading, signing flows) also need confirmation.

Security signals we found

01

Prevents silent derivation of an unintended wallet from a mistyped BIP39 passphrase

02

Adds user-input confirmation to reduce risk of fund loss / inaccessible wallet

03

No cryptographic weakness fixed; the issue is usability leading to loss of funds

04

Patch is partial: only covers wallet-level and terminal seed imports, not all passphrase entry points

Risk score

Why this scored 34/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 8/30
Exploitability 5/25
Stealth signal 3/15
Affected reach 6/15
Confidence 8/10
Evidence quality 4/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.