AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Low 42 Bitcoin

correct an amount or fee entry that parses as zero when only part of it validates

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by Craig Raw

50/100 · Thin
correct an amount or fee entry that parses as zero when only part of it validates
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component! No meaningful explanatory body
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit fixes a bug in Sparrow Wallet's text input handling for Bitcoin amounts and transaction fees. Previously, if a user typed something like '0abc', the wallet would partially match only the '0' and treat the amount as zero, silently dropping the invalid trailing characters. This could let a user accidentally (or be tricked into) entering an amount that the wallet interprets as zero when they intended something else. The fix now only keeps a zero value if the entire typed text is a valid amount, not just a partial match.

Recommended action

Treat as a low-to-moderate UI correctness fix. Review whether the zero-amount early-return path is necessary at all, and add regression tests for inputs like '0abc', '0.0.0', and locale-specific separators. Consider whether downstream transaction construction treats a zero amount/fee as a no-op or as a valid value, and ensure the UI blocks submission of invalid/partially parsed amounts.

Security signals we found

01

UI input sanitization bug: partial regex match accepted as valid zero amount

02

Potential for user-induced zero-value transactions or fees

03

No explicit security framing in commit message or diff

Risk score

Why this scored 42/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 8/30
Exploitability 7/25
Stealth signal 8/15
Affected reach 10/15
Confidence 6/10
Evidence quality 3/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.