AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Moderate 51 Bitcoin

fix sp self-spend output discovery by always scanning all batch txs

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by Craig Raw

50/100 · Thin
fix sp self-spend output discovery by always scanning all batch txs
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component! No meaningful explanatory body
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit fixes a bug in Sparrow Wallet's silent payments feature. Previously, when scanning for incoming silent payments, the wallet only looked at transactions it had not already seen. This meant it could miss a special kind of transaction: one where the user sends bitcoin to themselves (a 'self-spend'). Because the wallet already knew about the transaction, it skipped re-scanning it for silent payment outputs, potentially causing the wallet to not display or account for those funds. The fix makes the wallet scan all relevant transactions, whether already known or not.

Recommended action

Users relying on silent payments should upgrade to a version containing this commit and consider rescanning their wallet to ensure any missed self-spend silent payment outputs are discovered. Developers should review whether other scanning paths have similar 'skip already-known transactions' optimizations that could omit outputs.

Security signals we found

01

Functional bug in cryptocurrency wallet output discovery

02

Silent payment self-spend outputs could remain undiscovered

03

Potential wallet balance/UTXO accounting discrepancy

04

No explicit security framing in commit message

Risk score

Why this scored 51/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 18/30
Exploitability 5/25
Stealth signal 8/15
Affected reach 10/15
Confidence 7/10
Evidence quality 3/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.