AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Low 45 Bitcoin

add additional fee rate limit check for high fee transactions

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by Craig Raw

50/100 · Thin
add additional fee rate limit check for high fee transactions
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component! No meaningful explanatory body
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit adds an extra safety check in Sparrow Wallet that warns users before broadcasting Bitcoin transactions with extremely high fee rates. Previously, the wallet only warned if the fee rate exceeded the top of a long-term fee rate range. Now it also warns if the fee rate is more than 100 times the default fee rate. This helps prevent users from accidentally overpaying transaction fees, which could be caused by user error, wallet misconfiguration, or potentially a malicious or compromised transaction.

Recommended action

No immediate action required. This is a defensive hardening change. Users should ensure they are running a Sparrow Wallet version that includes this commit if they want the additional high-fee warning. Developers may want to review whether 100x is an appropriate threshold and whether the default fee rate source is reliable.

Security signals we found

01

Adds a user-facing confirmation dialog for high fee rate transactions

02

Introduces a hard-coded multiplier limit (100x default fee rate) as a safety guard

03

Prevents accidental or malicious overpayment of Bitcoin transaction fees

04

Does not change transaction validation logic, only warning behavior

Risk score

Why this scored 45/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 12/30
Exploitability 8/25
Stealth signal 5/15
Affected reach 10/15
Confidence 7/10
Evidence quality 3/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.