AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Low 31 Bitcoin

preserve sp scan cache cancellation across widening rollback

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by Craig Raw

50/100 · Thin
preserve sp scan cache cancellation across widening rollback
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component! No meaningful explanatory body
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit fixes a small logic bug in how Sparrow Wallet caches scans for silent payments (a privacy-preserving way to receive Bitcoin). During a specific multi-step process called 'widening rollback,' if the user or a server disconnect had already cancelled the scan, the code could accidentally un-cancel it and restore old cached data. The fix simply checks 'if already cancelled, stay cancelled' before restoring the snapshot. It is a correctness/reliability fix rather than a direct theft-of-funds vulnerability, but it could cause the wallet to miss or misreport silent-payment transactions after a cancellation.

Recommended action

Treat as a low-to-moderate reliability fix. Users relying on silent payments should upgrade to a release containing this commit to avoid scenarios where a cancelled scan is inadvertently resumed from stale cache state. No immediate emergency response is warranted absent evidence of active exploitation.

Security signals we found

01

State resurrection bug in concurrency/caching logic

02

Cancellation signal could be lost during rollback

03

Fix touches privacy-sensitive silent payment scanning

04

No input validation or cryptographic change

Risk score

Why this scored 31/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 8/30
Exploitability 3/25
Stealth signal 6/15
Affected reach 5/15
Confidence 6/10
Evidence quality 3/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.