AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Moderate 59 Bitcoin

escape backticks in schema name for drop schema statement

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by Craig Raw

50/100 · Thin
escape backticks in schema name for drop schema statement
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component! No meaningful explanatory body
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit fixes a bug where a wallet name containing a backtick character could break or manipulate the SQL command used to delete a wallet account. The fix both prevents users from typing backticks into wallet names and safely escapes any backtick that already exists before running the database command. This is a defensive hardening change rather than a confirmed remote attack.

Recommended action

Review whether other dynamic schema/table/column identifiers built from wallet names are similarly quoted and escaped. Prefer using the database's built-in identifier-quoting APIs or bound identifiers rather than string concatenation for SQL identifiers.

Security signals we found

01

SQL identifier escaping hardening in DROP SCHEMA

02

Backtick character added to wallet-name sanitization regex

03

Backtick doubling applied to existing schema names before SQL execution

04

No vendor security advisory or CVE referenced in commit

Risk score

Why this scored 59/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 18/30
Exploitability 12/25
Stealth signal 8/15
Affected reach 10/15
Confidence 7/10
Evidence quality 4/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.