AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Moderate 59 Bitcoin

only save certificates passing hostname verification as ca validated, and retain not yet valid certificates

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by Craig Raw

60/100 · Adequate
only save certificates passing hostname verification as ca validated, and retain not yet valid certificates
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Mentions testing or verification! No meaningful explanatory body
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit tightens how Sparrow Wallet saves and reuses TLS certificates for private servers. Previously, any certificate that passed a basic CA check was saved as 'CA validated' even if it didn't actually match the server's hostname. That could let a malicious or misconfigured server trick the wallet into trusting the wrong certificate. Now the app also checks that the certificate's hostname matches the server, and it no longer deletes certificates that are merely 'not yet valid' (which can happen if the user's computer clock is wrong).

Recommended action

Users relying on private Electrum servers over TLS should upgrade. Review any previously saved CA-validated certificates, as older versions may have trusted certificates that did not match the server hostname. Ensure system clocks are correct, as not-yet-valid certificates are now retained rather than deleted.

Security signals we found

01

Missing hostname verification before saving CA-trusted certificate

02

Broad exception handling previously caused deletion of saved certificates on any CertificateException

03

Certificate pinning/trust-store logic for private Electrum servers

04

TLS trust decision made without server identity validation

Risk score

Why this scored 59/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 18/30
Exploitability 12/25
Stealth signal 10/15
Affected reach 8/15
Confidence 7/10
Evidence quality 4/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.