AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Moderate 57 Bitcoin

discard stale electrum responses with mismatched ids

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by Craig Raw

50/100 · Thin
discard stale electrum responses with mismatched ids
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component! No meaningful explanatory body
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit changes how Sparrow Wallet's connection to Electrum servers handles replies. Previously, the app tried to match an entire sent request object to a received response object to decide if the reply belonged to the current request. The new code instead compares only the numeric 'id' fields found in the JSON, and keeps reading and discarding any responses whose ids don't match. It also adds optional wire-level logging. The change is a defensive fix against 'stale' or out-of-order server responses being mistaken for the answer to the current request.

Recommended action

Treat as a hardening/defensive fix. Review whether the regex id extraction correctly handles batched requests, non-numeric ids, and JSON escaping; ensure the discard loop cannot be induced into an infinite loop by a malicious or buggy server that never returns matching ids. No immediate emergency action is indicated by the diff alone, but users relying on custom Electrum servers should update when a release containing this commit is available.

Security signals we found

01

Request/response correlation now validated by id sets rather than full object equality

02

Loop discards responses with mismatched ids, mitigating stale or injected response confusion

03

Adds disabled wire logger for traffic analysis

04

No explicit security framing, CVE, or advisory in commit or supplied references

Risk score

Why this scored 57/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 18/30
Exploitability 12/25
Stealth signal 8/15
Affected reach 10/15
Confidence 6/10
Evidence quality 3/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.