AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Moderate 59 Bitcoin

only apply dns payment resolutions matching the currently entered recipient

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by Craig Raw

50/100 · Thin
only apply dns payment resolutions matching the currently entered recipient
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component! No meaningful explanatory body
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit fixes a race condition in Sparrow Wallet's payment screen. When a user types a human-readable payment name (like a DNS-based address), every keystroke that forms a valid name triggers a slow background lookup. If the user keeps typing or changes the recipient, an older lookup could finish later and overwrite the current recipient address with the wrong one. The fix checks that the lookup result still matches what the user has actually typed before applying it.

Recommended action

Review the drongo submodule bump (4336bbd469e9bdd91531f55ac0f2bdb3ca07efb4) for related DNS payment changes. Consider adding cancellation of in-flight DnsPaymentService tasks when the HRN changes, and add regression tests covering rapid recipient changes and out-of-order DNS responses. Users should upgrade to a release containing this commit.

Security signals we found

01

Race condition between asynchronous DNS resolution and user input

02

Possible recipient-address overwrite by stale lookup result

03

UI state desynchronization (displayed recipient vs. resolved recipient)

04

Potential for user to send funds to an unintended address

05

Missing validation that async result corresponds to current input

Risk score

Why this scored 59/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 18/30
Exploitability 12/25
Stealth signal 10/15
Affected reach 8/15
Confidence 7/10
Evidence quality 4/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.