AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Informational 16 Bitcoin

map transaction hex witness segments by the segwit flag and treat an input with no witness as empty, matching the serializer rather than relying on it having filled them in

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by Craig Raw

50/100 · Thin
map transaction hex witness segments by the segwit flag and treat an input with no witness as empty, matching the serializer rather than relying on it having filled them in
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component! No meaningful explanatory body
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit fixes how Sparrow Wallet's transaction hex viewer highlights the parts of a SegWit Bitcoin transaction. Previously, if a SegWit transaction contained an input with no witness data, the viewer would skip highlighting that input's witness section entirely, causing the colored segments to fall out of sync with the actual raw transaction bytes. The change now correctly shows an empty witness for such inputs, keeping the display aligned with how the transaction is really serialized.

Recommended action

No immediate security action required. This is a UI correctness fix. Verify that the updated segment mapping correctly handles SegWit transactions with mixed witness/non-witness inputs and consider adding unit tests for TransactionHexArea segment offsets.

Security signals we found

01

UI display desynchronization between parsed transaction and raw hex

02

Incorrect handling of BIP-141 SegWit witness serialization

03

Potential for user confusion or misreading of transaction bytes

Risk score

Why this scored 16/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 2/30
Exploitability 1/25
Stealth signal 1/15
Affected reach 2/15
Confidence 7/10
Evidence quality 3/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.