AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Moderate 59 Monero

[Draft] Fix loads

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by Justin Ehrenhofer

28/100 · Opaque
[Draft] Fix loads
✓ Subject identifies a change! No meaningful explanatory body
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit fixes several wallet-loading bugs in a Monero wallet app. The most important change corrects how restored wallets are created: previously the app told the backend that every restored wallet was 'new', which made it skip scanning old transactions, so users could see a zero balance after restoring. The patch also prevents the app from opening the same wallet file twice, stops repeated connection attempts from racing each other, and makes the app detect when a wallet exists in the opposite mode (full node vs light wallet server). These are reliability and correctness fixes rather than remote attack vectors, but the 'new wallet' flag bug could cause real funds to appear missing.

Recommended action

Review and merge after testing restore flows for both LWS and full-node modes, verify that switching between modes no longer leaves orphaned wallet files, and confirm the monero_c dependency bump does not introduce unrelated breaking changes. Consider adding automated tests for restore height handling and mode-switch file detection.

Security signals we found

01

Corrected restore flag that caused restored wallets to skip blockchain scan, potentially showing zero balance

02

Prevented duplicate wallet opens that could leave two sync loops writing the same cache

03

Serialized in-flight daemon connections to avoid overlapping Wallet_init calls on the same native wallet

04

Added wallet-file existence check for the correct mode before onboarding, reducing risk of overwriting an existing wallet

05

Dependency bump in pubspec.lock for monero_c FFI wrapper

Risk score

Why this scored 59/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 18/30
Exploitability 8/25
Stealth signal 10/15
Affected reach 12/15
Confidence 7/10
Evidence quality 4/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.