What changed, and why it matters
This commit simply updates the version of an external Monero library (monero_c) that the Skylight Wallet app depends on. The actual code changes are not shown in this diff—only the version reference was changed. There is no visible security fix or security problem in the commit itself.
Review the actual changes in the monero_c repository between the two referenced commits to determine whether the update includes security fixes, bug fixes, or breaking changes before drawing any security conclusion.
Security signals we found
No strong security signals were identified.
Evidence from the diff
The diff updates the Git reference for the monero_c submodule/dependency from commit c74f8dfcc07f56720c0239d5829995c8e20033c2 to a6b66e5eba24350150ceed2364f8272d076f165d in pubspec.yaml and pubspec.lock. The monero_c directory is referenced as changed, but no file contents are provided. No security-relevant code changes are visible in the supplied diff.
Changed components
monero_c dependencypubspec.yamlpubspec.lockInspect captured patch +4 / −4
diff --git a/pubspec.lock b/pubspec.lock
index 7dc49eb..4fe459f 100644
--- a/pubspec.lock
+++ b/pubspec.lock
@@ -665,8 +665,8 @@ packages:
dependency: "direct main"
description:
path: "impls/monero.dart"
- ref: c74f8dfcc07f56720c0239d5829995c8e20033c2
- resolved-ref: c74f8dfcc07f56720c0239d5829995c8e20033c2
+ ref: a6b66e5eba24350150ceed2364f8272d076f165d
+ resolved-ref: a6b66e5eba24350150ceed2364f8272d076f165d
url: "https://github.com/magicgrants/monero_c"
source: git
version: "0.0.0"
diff --git a/pubspec.yaml b/pubspec.yaml
index 26b5e70..74d4d6b 100644
--- a/pubspec.yaml
+++ b/pubspec.yaml
@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ dependencies:
monero:
git:
url: https://github.com/magicgrants/monero_c
- ref: c74f8dfcc07f56720c0239d5829995c8e20033c2
+ ref: a6b66e5eba24350150ceed2364f8272d076f165d
path: impls/monero.dart
openalias_ffi:
path: plugins/openalias_ffi
Why this scored 4/100
Community notes
Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.
The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.