AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Low 32 Bitcoin

Forward invoice requests to async recipient

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by elnosh

68/100 · Adequate
Forward invoice requests to async recipient

As a static invoice server, if we receive an invoice request on
behalf of an often-offline recipient we will reply to the sender
with the static invoice previously provided by the async recipient.

Here, in addition to doing that we'll forward the invoice request
received to the async recipient to give it a chance to reply with
a fresh invoice in case it is online.
✓ Descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Provides detailed explanatory context
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit adds a feature to the Lightning Dev Kit that lets an always-online invoice server forward a payer's invoice request to an often-offline recipient, giving the recipient a chance to respond with a fresh invoice if it is online. The server still sends the stored static invoice to the payer as a fallback. The change is a functional enhancement to the async payments flow, not a security fix. It renames a public API method and adds new event fields, requiring downstream users to update their code.

Recommended action

Treat this as a feature/API change rather than a security patch. Downstream projects using the async payments API should update to respond_to_static_invoice_request, persist the new invoice_request_path, and handle the forwarded invoice_request. Review the duplicate-invoice handling in payment flows to ensure it behaves correctly with both static and fresh Bolt12 invoices.

Security signals we found

01

API rename: send_static_invoice -> respond_to_static_invoice_request (breaking change for consumers)

02

New event fields invoice_request_path and invoice_request require downstream persistence and handling

03

Forwarding of invoice requests over blinded paths introduces additional message handling path

04

Duplicate invoice detection logic is exercised in new tests (ignore_duplicate_invoice)

05

No explicit security claims or vulnerability fixes in commit message or diff

Risk score

Why this scored 32/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 5/30
Exploitability 5/25
Stealth signal 5/15
Affected reach 5/15
Confidence 8/10
Evidence quality 4/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.