AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Informational 15 Bitcoin

Rename NegotiatedTxInput to TxInMetadata

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by Jeffrey Czyz

50/100 · Thin
Rename NegotiatedTxInput to TxInMetadata

Now that NegotiatedTxInput no longer holds a TxIn, rename it
accordingly.
✓ Descriptive subject✓ Provides an explanatory body
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit is a simple internal code cleanup: it renames a Rust struct from NegotiatedTxInput to TxInMetadata and updates all references. The commit message explicitly says the rename is because the struct no longer holds a full transaction input. There is no functional change to transaction handling, cryptography, network behavior, or serialization format.

Recommended action

No security action needed; treat as ordinary maintenance/refactor.

Security signals we found

No strong security signals were identified.

Risk score

Why this scored 15/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 0/30
Exploitability 0/25
Stealth signal 0/15
Affected reach 0/15
Confidence 10/10
Evidence quality 5/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.