AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Informational 18 Bitcoin

Allow `FutureSpawner` to return the result of the spawned future

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by Matt Corallo

73/100 · Adequate
Allow `FutureSpawner` to return the result of the spawned future

`tokio::spawn` can be use both to spawn a forever-running
background task or to spawn a task which gets `poll`ed
independently and eventually returns a result which the callsite
wants.

In LDK, we have only ever needed the first, and thus didn't bother
defining a return type for `FutureSpawner::spawn`. However, in the
next commit we'll start using `FutureSpawner` in a context where we
actually do want the spawned future's result. Thus, here, we add a
result output to `FutureSpawner::spawn`, mirroring the
`tokio::spawn` API.
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Provides detailed explanatory context
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit is a routine internal API change. It updates the FutureSpawner trait so that spawning a background future can return the future's result, similar to tokio::spawn. It does not fix a security bug and does not introduce obvious security flaws; it is preparation for a later feature.

Recommended action

No security action required. Review the subsequent commit mentioned in the message to understand how the new return value will be used, and verify that any future caller which polls the returned handle handles cancellation/panic errors appropriately.

Security signals we found

01

No security-relevant keywords in commit title or message

02

No bounds checks, input validation, or cryptographic changes

03

No memory safety, concurrency hazard, or privilege changes introduced

04

Trait signature change only; existing callers ignore returned handle

Risk score

Why this scored 18/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 2/30
Exploitability 1/25
Stealth signal 1/15
Affected reach 2/15
Confidence 8/10
Evidence quality 4/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.