AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Low 34 Bitcoin

Add `EventQueue` persistence

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by Elias Rohrer

50/100 · Thin
Add `EventQueue` persistence

We add simple `persist` call to `EventQueue` that persists it under a
`event_queue` key.
✓ Descriptive subject✓ Provides an explanatory body
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit adds the ability to save (persist) the LiquidityManager's event queue to disk so events survive application restarts. It is a feature commit, not a security patch. Most event types are explicitly documented as not persisted, while LSPS2 'OpenChannel' and LSPS5 'SendWebhookNotification' events are now saved and replayed after restart. The code includes safety notes warning callers to make their channel-opening logic idempotent because persisted events may be replayed.

Recommended action

Review downstream callers of LSPS2ServiceEvent::OpenChannel and LSPS5ServiceEvent::SendWebhookNotification to confirm they implement idempotent handling before relying on persisted-event replay. Ensure the KVStore implementation used provides atomic/consistent writes for the new event_queue key. No immediate patch is required; this is a feature addition with documented operational caveats.

Security signals we found

01

New persistence surface introduced for in-memory event queue

02

Replay of persisted events after restart could lead to duplicate channel opens if callers do not implement idempotency

03

Serialization skips unknown odd-type TLVs, which is the expected forward-compatibility behavior but means unknown events are silently lost on reload

04

No input validation changes; persistence relies on existing KVStore abstraction

05

Documentation explicitly warns about idempotency requirement for OpenChannel replay

Risk score

Why this scored 34/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 8/30
Exploitability 5/25
Stealth signal 4/15
Affected reach 6/15
Confidence 7/10
Evidence quality 4/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.