AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Low 30 Bitcoin

lightning-payer-proof: flag the uniffi record's untrusted strings

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by auto-pr-bot

73/100 · Adequate
lightning-payer-proof: flag the uniffi record's untrusted strings

The uniffi record hands its three free-text fields back as plain
`String`s, copied straight out of the proof with no sanitization, but
only `offer_description` warned about that. `offer_issuer` and
`proof_note` are just as attacker-controlled, so carry the same warning
on both.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Provides detailed explanatory context
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit only adds documentation comments warning developers that two text fields returned by a UniFFI record are untrusted and should be sanitized before display. It does not change any code behavior, add sanitization, or fix an active vulnerability. It is a defensive documentation improvement for a potential injection/display-risk issue.

Recommended action

Treat as a low-priority hygiene/documentation patch. If using these strings in UI or logs, ensure downstream callers sanitize control characters. Consider following up with runtime sanitization or a safe display type rather than relying solely on doc comments.

Security signals we found

01

untrusted attacker-controlled strings exposed through FFI binding

02

missing runtime sanitization of free-text proof fields

03

documentation-only warning about control-character injection/display risks

04

partial hardening (warning only, no code change)

Risk score

Why this scored 30/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 3/30
Exploitability 4/25
Stealth signal 6/15
Affected reach 5/15
Confidence 8/10
Evidence quality 4/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.