AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Informational 15 Bitcoin

Rename PendingSplice::pending_funding to negotiated_candidates

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by Jeffrey Czyz

73/100 · Adequate
Rename PendingSplice::pending_funding to negotiated_candidates

An upcoming commit will rename PendingSplice to PendingFunding. Thus,
rename the similarly named field to something more meaningful. It
includes FundingScopes that have been negotiated but have not reached
enough confirmations by both parties to have exchanged splice_locked.
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Provides detailed explanatory context
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit is a simple internal rename of a struct field from `pending_funding` to `negotiated_candidates` in the Lightning channel code. It does not change any behavior, logic, or security properties. The change is purely cosmetic to make the code easier to understand before a later refactor.

Recommended action

No action needed. This is a non-functional refactor.

Security signals we found

No strong security signals were identified.

Risk score

Why this scored 15/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 0/30
Exploitability 0/25
Stealth signal 0/15
Affected reach 0/15
Confidence 10/10
Evidence quality 5/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.