AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Moderate 50 Bitcoin

Avoid leaking stale filesystem store temp files

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by Elias Rohrer

48/100 · Thin
Avoid leaking stale filesystem store temp files

Async filesystem writes may be awaited out of order, making older writes stale after their temporary data has already been created. Clean up stale or failed write attempts on a best-effort basis so they do not leave historical plaintext data in *.tmp files, without reporting cleanup failures as persistence failures.

Co-Authored-By: HAL 9000

This finding was discovered by Project Loupe
✓ Descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Provides detailed explanatory context! Contains work-in-progress language
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This change fixes a cleanup problem in the Lightning Dev Kit's file-saving code. When two saves for the same file happen at nearly the same time, an earlier, out-of-date save could leave behind a temporary file containing plain data. The patch now deletes those leftover temporary files so sensitive information isn't left sitting on disk longer than necessary. It is a defensive hardening fix rather than a direct remote exploit.

Recommended action

Apply the patch. Review backup and file-recovery procedures on nodes that may have run affected versions to ensure no historical .tmp files remain in the persistence directory. Consider adding monitoring or periodic cleanup for orphaned .tmp files on existing deployments until patched.

Security signals we found

01

Temporary file leak of historical plaintext data

02

Best-effort cleanup added on write failure and stale write paths

03

Async write ordering can produce stale temp files

04

Plaintext channel state potentially recoverable from leftover .tmp files

05

Defensive hardening in persistence layer

Risk score

Why this scored 50/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 12/30
Exploitability 8/25
Stealth signal 9/15
Affected reach 10/15
Confidence 7/10
Evidence quality 4/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.