← Watch feed
chore: remove redundant .to_string() call in embedded example
What changed, and why it matters
This is a trivial code cleanup in an embedded example. It removes an unnecessary .to_string() call on a hardcoded test string. There is no security relevance.
Recommended action
No action needed; this is a non-security cleanup change.
Security signals we found
No strong security signals were identified.
Evidence from the diff
The commit changes one line in bitcoin/embedded/src/main.rs, removing a redundant .to_string() on the expected address string in an assert_eq! within an embedded example. The behavior is identical; it is purely a style/refactoring change.
Changed components
bitcoin/embedded/src/main.rsInspect captured patch +1 / −1
diff --git a/bitcoin/embedded/src/main.rs b/bitcoin/embedded/src/main.rs
index 42c02d40..5ec9cb07 100644
--- a/bitcoin/embedded/src/main.rs
+++ b/bitcoin/embedded/src/main.rs
@@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ fn main() -> ! {
let address = Address::p2wpkh(pubkey, Network::Bitcoin);
hprintln!("Address: {}", address).unwrap();
- assert_eq!(address.to_string(), "bc1qpx9t9pzzl4qsydmhyt6ctrxxjd4ep549np9993".to_string());
+ assert_eq!(address.to_string(), "bc1qpx9t9pzzl4qsydmhyt6ctrxxjd4ep549np9993");
// exit QEMU
// NOTE do not run this on hardware; it can corrupt OpenOCD state
debug::exit(debug::EXIT_SUCCESS);
Risk score
Our methodology →Why this scored 15/100
Human-validated context
Community notes
Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.
No validated notes yet.
The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.