AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Informational 15 Bitcoin

Merge rust-bitcoin/rust-bitcoin#6748: Capitalize Bitcoin protocol references in docs

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by Andrew Poelstra

100/100 · Strong
Merge rust-bitcoin/rust-bitcoin#6748: Capitalize Bitcoin protocol references in docs

2d9f0e3cbce7aed99fb2bf6537a6bf67e6fb3963 Capitalize Bitcoin protocol references (Jamil Lambert, PhD)
77054a4f9113d1a0d5f2f61c3279c36701960a21 Hyphenate rust-bitcoin (Jamil Lambert, PhD)
cbedca4543c24a5ac41abeffb2e307b4eac92921 Standardize Bitcoin network naming in docs (Jamil Lambert, PhD)

Pull request description:

Bitcoin should have a capital `B` when referring to the protocol, network, or software. And lower case `b` when referring to the currency.

Correct all of the docs so that the capitalization is consistent. Including a couple of other minor adjacent corrections.

Standardize docs to `Bitcoin {network}`.


ACKs for top commit:
tcharding:
ACK 2d9f0e3cbce7aed99fb2bf6537a6bf67e6fb3963
apoelstra:
ACK 2d9f0e3cbce7aed99fb2bf6537a6bf67e6fb3963; successfully ran local tests


Tree-SHA512: 453d72987c6d1fb0e7e86cda6f66ea60e596fbf801a3b5374e661d66a838e6b20c949adab9d362c277cc1957cec96c9613b3c953677a7103231264c1e668a579
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Provides detailed explanatory context✓ Explains rationale or failure mode✓ Mentions testing or verification✓ Links an issue, advisory, or supporting reference
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit only fixes capitalization and hyphenation in documentation and code comments. It does not change any program logic, data handling, or security behavior. There is no security issue.

Recommended action

No action required. This is a cosmetic documentation cleanup with no security relevance.

Security signals we found

No strong security signals were identified.

Risk score

Why this scored 15/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 0/30
Exploitability 0/25
Stealth signal 0/15
Affected reach 0/15
Confidence 10/10
Evidence quality 5/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.