AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Informational 15 Bitcoin

hashes: use consistent round numbering in sha256 comments

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by jrakibi

73/100 · Adequate
hashes: use consistent round numbering in sha256 comments

the 1-way ARM and x86 SHA-NI functions used Rounds 0-3 while
the 2-way ARM function used Rounds 1-4 in the comments.

use this consistently everywhere.
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Provides detailed explanatory context
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit only changes comments in the SHA-256 code. It makes the round-number labels consistent between different versions of the optimized code (ARM and x86). No actual program logic, math, or behavior was changed, so it cannot affect security or correctness.

Recommended action

No security action needed. This is a documentation/comment cleanup commit.

Security signals we found

No strong security signals were identified.

Risk score

Why this scored 15/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 0/30
Exploitability 0/25
Stealth signal 0/15
Affected reach 0/15
Confidence 10/10
Evidence quality 5/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.