What the developer wrote
Authored by Jamil Lambert, PhD
Update stale semver check PR comment
The comment added by the semver check workflow when an API break is
detected is stale.
Update the comment with the new CI check name.
What changed, and why it matters
This commit only updates the text of an automated comment left by a GitHub workflow when an API-breaking change is detected. It changes the instructions so they point to the correct CI job name. There is no code change, no security fix, and no vulnerability.
No security action needed. This is a routine documentation/comment maintenance change within CI metadata.
Security signals we found
No strong security signals were identified.
Evidence from the diff
A single string in .github/workflows/semver-checks-pr-label.yml is updated. The workflow posts a PR comment when cargo-semver-checks detects an API break. The comment body now references the renamed CI job (‘Continuous integration / Check (api)’) and step (‘Run api’) instead of the old names. No executable logic, permissions, secrets, or dependencies were modified.
Changed components
.github/workflows/semver-checks-pr-label.ymlInspect captured patch +1 / −1
diff --git a/.github/workflows/semver-checks-pr-label.yml b/.github/workflows/semver-checks-pr-label.yml
index f525ec6d..947b1ee3 100644
--- a/.github/workflows/semver-checks-pr-label.yml
+++ b/.github/workflows/semver-checks-pr-label.yml
@@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ jobs:
owner: context.repo.owner,
repo: context.repo.repo,
issue_number: issue_number,
- body: ':rotating_light: API BREAKING CHANGE DETECTED\n\nTo see the changes click details on "Check semver breaks / PR Semver - stable toolchain" job then expand "Run semver checker script" and scroll to the end of the section.'
+ body: ':rotating_light: API BREAKING CHANGE DETECTED\n\nTo see the changes click details on "Continuous integration / Check (api)" job then expand "Run api" and scroll to the end of the section.'
});
// add the label to the PR
Why this scored 15/100
Community notes
Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.
The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.