AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Informational 19 Bitcoin

hashes: include midstate and buffer in MidstateError

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by jrakibi

100/100 · Strong
hashes: include midstate and buffer in MidstateError

when HashEngine::midstate() fails due to non-block-aligned data, the
error now includes the closest block-aligned `Midstate` and the
unprocessed partial-block bytes.

This would allow the caller to recover and resume hashing (the next patch
explains how in a test case)

Closes https://github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-bitcoin/issues/5483
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Provides detailed explanatory context✓ Explains rationale or failure mode✓ Mentions testing or verification✓ Links an issue, advisory, or supporting reference
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This change enriches an error type in the SHA-256 hashing code. When a caller asks for the internal 'midstate' snapshot at a non-aligned point, the error now also returns the nearest aligned snapshot and any leftover bytes, so the caller can resume hashing later. It is a feature/API improvement, not a fix for an active security flaw.

Recommended action

No security action required; review as a normal API change. If consumed downstream, verify that callers do not accidentally rely on the new fields for security-critical decisions without checking alignment themselves.

Security signals we found

01

No memory-safety bug signals: the diff uses existing Rust slice indexing with a length derived from the same buffer

02

No secret-exposure signals: the returned midstate and buffer are exactly what the caller already supplied/hashed

03

No authentication-bypass or integrity-break signals

04

Error-type expansion is API-facing, not a vulnerability patch

Risk score

Why this scored 19/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 2/30
Exploitability 1/25
Stealth signal 1/15
Affected reach 3/15
Confidence 8/10
Evidence quality 4/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.