What changed, and why it matters
This commit only fixes grammar in comments and a shell script help message. No code behavior is changed, so it has no security relevance.
No security action needed; this is a routine documentation cleanup commit.
Security signals we found
No strong security signals were identified.
Evidence from the diff
The diff modifies four lines across two files: a comment in fuzz/fuzz-util.sh changes ‘output’ to ‘outputs’, and three doc comments in internals/src/array.rs rephrase ‘is intentionally shadowing’ to ‘intentionally shadows’. These are purely documentation/grammar edits with no functional changes to Rust or shell code.
Changed components
Inspect captured patch +4 / −4
diff --git a/fuzz/fuzz-util.sh b/fuzz/fuzz-util.sh
index 0b3cd82b..776afc70 100755
--- a/fuzz/fuzz-util.sh
+++ b/fuzz/fuzz-util.sh
@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ checkWindowsFiles() {
fi
}
-# Checks whether a fuzz case output some report, and dumps it in hex
+# Checks whether a fuzz case outputs some report, and dumps it in hex
checkReport() {
reportFile="hfuzz_workspace/$1/HONGGFUZZ.REPORT.TXT"
if [ -f "$reportFile" ]; then
diff --git a/internals/src/array.rs b/internals/src/array.rs
index 4142212b..c56401c9 100644
--- a/internals/src/array.rs
+++ b/internals/src/array.rs
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ pub trait ArrayExt {
///
/// Fails to compile if the array is empty.
///
- /// Note that this method's name is intentionally shadowing the `std`'s `first` method which
+ /// Note that this method's name intentionally shadows the `std`'s `first` method which
/// returns `Option`. The rationale is that given the known length of the array, we always know
/// that this will not return `None` so trying to keep the `std` method around is pointless.
/// Importing the trait will also cause compile failures - that's also intentional to expose
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ pub trait ArrayExt {
///
/// Fails to compile if the array is empty.
///
- /// Note that this method's name is intentionally shadowing the `std`'s `split_first` method which
+ /// Note that this method's name intentionally shadows the `std`'s `split_first` method which
/// returns `Option`. The rationale is that given the known length of the array, we always know
/// that this will not return `None` so trying to keep the `std` method around is pointless.
/// Importing the trait will also cause compile failures - that's also intentional to expose
@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ pub trait ArrayExt {
///
/// Fails to compile if the array is empty.
///
- /// Note that this method's name is intentionally shadowing the `std`'s `split_last` method which
+ /// Note that this method's name intentionally shadows the `std`'s `split_last` method which
/// returns `Option`. The rationale is that given the known length of the array, we always know
/// that this will not return `None` so trying to keep the `std` method around is pointless.
/// Importing the trait will also cause compile failures - that's also intentional to expose
Why this scored 15/100
Community notes
Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.
The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.