AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Informational 18 Bitcoin

deps: bump secp256k1 to 0.33.0

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by satsfy (Renato Britto)

68/100 · Adequate
deps: bump secp256k1 to 0.33.0

The 0.32.0-beta line was yanked from crates.io when 0.33.0 was
released.

XOnlyPublicKey::serialize was deprecated for to_byte_array.
secp256k1::Keypair::from_seckey_byte_array became
`from_secret_bytes`.
✓ Descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Provides detailed explanatory context
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit updates the project's cryptographic library dependency from a beta version to a stable release. The old beta version was removed from the package registry, so this change is primarily about keeping the project buildable and current. The code changes are limited to renaming two function calls to match the new library version. There is no direct evidence in the commit of a security vulnerability being fixed.

Recommended action

No immediate security action required. Verify that CI passes with secp256k1 0.33.0 and secp256k1-sys 0.14.0. Review the upstream secp256k1 0.33.0 release notes separately for any security advisories, as this commit does not enumerate them. Consider pinning to stable versions rather than beta releases in the future.

Security signals we found

01

Dependency bump from yanked beta version to stable release

02

Cryptographic library (secp256k1) version update

03

No explicit security claims in commit message

04

No CVE or advisory references in commit

05

No functional code changes beyond API renames

Risk score

Why this scored 18/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 2/30
Exploitability 1/25
Stealth signal 1/15
Affected reach 3/15
Confidence 8/10
Evidence quality 3/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.