AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Informational 15 Bitcoin

Change opcodes from static to const

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by Tobin C. Harding

80/100 · Strong
Change opcodes from static to const

We don't need `static` here in the opcode declarations, we can use
`const` with no loss of generality because we don't need a fixed
memory address.
✓ Descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Provides detailed explanatory context✓ Explains rationale or failure mode
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit is a routine code-quality change. It replaces the word `static` with `const` for a handful of Bitcoin script opcode aliases (like OP_TRUE and OP_FALSE). In Rust, `const` values are inlined at compile time and do not need a fixed memory address, which is perfectly safe here. There is no security-relevant change.

Recommended action

No security action needed. Treat as a normal maintenance/refactoring commit.

Security signals we found

No strong security signals were identified.

Risk score

Why this scored 15/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 0/30
Exploitability 0/25
Stealth signal 0/15
Affected reach 0/15
Confidence 10/10
Evidence quality 5/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.