ci: adapt default and no feature bip32 test for rbmt 0.4.0
What the developer wrote
Authored by satsfy (Renato Britto)
ci: adapt default and no feature bip32 test for rbmt 0.4.0
Rbmt 0.4.0 changes how the example test matrix parses feature specs. The
sentinel for no default features was removed (bare name now means no default
features). The config relied on the old meaning that bip32 ran with default
features and 'bip32:-' ran with no features.
Translate both to the new syntax so the same two runs are preserved: 'bip32'
(no features) and 'bip32:std secp-recovery' (default feature set).
What changed, and why it matters
This is a routine update to the project's automated testing configuration. A tool used to run example tests changed its syntax, so the developer updated one line to keep the same tests running the same way. There is no user-facing change and no security relevance.
No security action needed. Treat as a normal CI maintenance commit.
Security signals we found
No strong security signals were identified.
Evidence from the diff
The commit updates bitcoin/Cargo.toml under [package.metadata.rbmt.test]. The rbmt (Rust Bitcoin Maintainers Tools) 0.4.0 test matrix parser removed the ‘bip32:-’ sentinel for ‘no default features’; now a bare package name means no default features. The patch replaces ‘bip32:-’ with ‘bip32:std secp-recovery’ so the CI matrix continues to test the bip32 example both with no features and with the default feature set. This is a CI/test-config only change with no code modifications.
Changed components
bitcoin/Cargo.tomlCI/test matrix configuration for rbmt 0.4.0Inspect captured patch +1 / −1
diff --git a/bitcoin/Cargo.toml b/bitcoin/Cargo.toml
index 4d4e93b6..66d86448 100644
--- a/bitcoin/Cargo.toml
+++ b/bitcoin/Cargo.toml
@@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ use_self = "warn"
[package.metadata.rbmt.test]
examples = [
"bip32",
- "bip32:-",
+ "bip32:std secp-recovery",
"sign-tx-segwit-v0:rand std",
"sign-tx-taproot:rand std",
"sighash:std",
Why this scored 15/100
Community notes
Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.
The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.