AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Informational 20 Bitcoin

build(deps): bump actions/github-script from 8.0.0 to 9.0.0

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by dependabot[bot]

93/100 · Strong
build(deps): bump actions/github-script from 8.0.0 to 9.0.0

Bumps [actions/github-script](https://github.com/actions/github-script) from 8.0.0 to 9.0.0.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/actions/github-script/releases)
- [Commits](https://github.com/actions/github-script/compare/ed597411d8f924073f98dfc5c65a23a2325f34cd...3a2844b7e9c422d3c10d287c895573f7108da1b3)

---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: actions/github-script
dependency-version: 9.0.0
dependency-type: direct:production
update-type: version-update:semver-major
...

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Uses a recognizable type or scope✓ Provides detailed explanatory context✓ Links an issue, advisory, or supporting reference
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This is a routine update by Dependabot that bumps the version of a GitHub Actions helper called actions/github-script from version 8.0.0 to 9.0.0 in two workflow files. The workflows only manage issue/label automation after CI runs and do not handle source code, secrets, or release artifacts. There is no indication in the commit that this fixes a security vulnerability.

Recommended action

Treat as routine maintenance. Review the upstream actions/github-script v9.0.0 release notes for any breaking changes before merging, and verify the pinned SHA matches the official release. No security-specific action is required based on the supplied materials.

Security signals we found

01

Dependency version bump of a third-party GitHub Action

02

Workflows use GITHUB_TOKEN with repository write scopes for issue/label management

03

No vendor disclosure of security relevance

04

No CVE or advisory referenced in commit or supplied materials

Risk score

Why this scored 20/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 2/30
Exploitability 2/25
Stealth signal 2/15
Affected reach 2/15
Confidence 8/10
Evidence quality 4/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.