AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Informational 15 Bitcoin

docs: fix inconsistent comment

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by radik878

47/100 · Thin
docs: fix inconsistent comment
✓ Descriptive subject✓ Uses a recognizable type or scope! No meaningful explanatory body
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit fixes a one-word typo in a Rust source code comment. The comment for a PSBT (Partially Signed Bitcoin Transaction) output map constant incorrectly referenced 'PSBT_IN_PROPRIETARY' (input) instead of 'PSBT_OUT_PROPRIETARY' (output). No executable code was changed, so there is no security or functional impact.

Recommended action

No action required. This is a non-functional documentation fix.

Security signals we found

No strong security signals were identified.

Risk score

Why this scored 15/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 0/30
Exploitability 0/25
Stealth signal 0/15
Affected reach 0/15
Confidence 10/10
Evidence quality 5/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.