What the developer wrote
Authored by Tobin C. Harding
Fuzz with latest MSRV
The daily fuzzing job is borked
error: package `syn v2.0.108` cannot be built because it requires rustc 1.68 or newer, while the currently active rustc version is 1.65.0
Either upgrade to rustc 1.68 or newer, or use
cargo update -p syn@2.0.108 --precise ver
where `ver` is the latest version of `syn` supporting rustc 1.65.0
Use the latest MSRV when fuzzing.
What changed, and why it matters
This is a routine maintenance update to a GitHub Actions workflow. The project’s daily automated fuzzing job was failing because a dependency required a newer Rust compiler than the one pinned in the workflow. The change simply bumps the compiler version used for fuzzing from Rust 1.65.0 to 1.74.0 so the job can run again. It does not change any library code, user-facing behavior, or security-sensitive logic.
No security action needed. Review as normal CI maintenance if desired.
Security signals we found
No strong security signals were identified.
Evidence from the diff
The commit modifies .github/workflows/cron-daily-fuzz.yml, changing the dtolnay/rust-toolchain pin from ‘1.65.0’ to ‘1.74.0’. The stated reason is that syn v2.0.108 requires rustc 1.68+, causing the daily fuzz workflow to fail. No source code, tests, or cryptographic logic are changed. This is a CI infrastructure fix, not a code patch.
Changed components
.github/workflows/cron-daily-fuzz.ymlInspect captured patch +1 / −1
diff --git a/.github/workflows/cron-daily-fuzz.yml b/.github/workflows/cron-daily-fuzz.yml
index 359aec43..937b4402 100644
--- a/.github/workflows/cron-daily-fuzz.yml
+++ b/.github/workflows/cron-daily-fuzz.yml
@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ jobs:
key: cache-${{ matrix.target }}-${{ hashFiles('**/Cargo.toml','**/Cargo.lock') }}
- uses: dtolnay/rust-toolchain@stable
with:
- toolchain: '1.65.0'
+ toolchain: '1.74.0'
- name: fuzz
run: |
if [[ "${{ matrix.fuzz_target }}" =~ ^bitcoin ]]; then
Why this scored 15/100
Community notes
Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.
The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.