AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Informational 15 Bitcoin

build(deps): bump github/codeql-action/upload-sarif

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by dependabot[bot]

93/100 · Strong
build(deps): bump github/codeql-action/upload-sarif

Bumps [github/codeql-action/upload-sarif](https://github.com/github/codeql-action) from 4.37.0 to 4.37.3.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/github/codeql-action/releases)
- [Changelog](https://github.com/github/codeql-action/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md)
- [Commits](https://github.com/github/codeql-action/compare/99df26d4f13ea111d4ec1a7dddef6063f76b97e9...e4fba868fa4b1b91e1fdab776edc8cfbe6e9fb81)

---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: github/codeql-action/upload-sarif
dependency-version: 4.37.3
dependency-type: direct:production
update-type: version-update:semver-patch
...

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Uses a recognizable type or scope✓ Provides detailed explanatory context✓ Links an issue, advisory, or supporting reference
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This is a routine patch-version update of a GitHub-maintained action used only to upload static-analysis results (SARIF files) from a scheduled CI job. The change does not touch any project source code, cryptographic logic, or user-facing behavior. There is no indication of a security fix or vulnerability.

Recommended action

No security action required. Treat as routine dependency maintenance; review the upstream release notes if desired.

Security signals we found

No strong security signals were identified.

Risk score

Why this scored 15/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 0/30
Exploitability 0/25
Stealth signal 0/15
Affected reach 0/15
Confidence 10/10
Evidence quality 5/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.