AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Informational 15 Bitcoin

build(deps): bump github/codeql-action/upload-sarif

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by dependabot[bot]

93/100 · Strong
build(deps): bump github/codeql-action/upload-sarif

Bumps [github/codeql-action/upload-sarif](https://github.com/github/codeql-action) from 4.35.2 to 4.35.4.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/github/codeql-action/releases)
- [Changelog](https://github.com/github/codeql-action/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md)
- [Commits](https://github.com/github/codeql-action/compare/95e58e9a2cdfd71adc6e0353d5c52f41a045d225...68bde559dea0fdcac2102bfdf6230c5f70eb485e)

---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: github/codeql-action/upload-sarif
dependency-version: 4.35.4
dependency-type: direct:production
update-type: version-update:semver-patch
...

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Uses a recognizable type or scope✓ Provides detailed explanatory context✓ Links an issue, advisory, or supporting reference
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This is a routine patch-version update of a GitHub-maintained security scanning helper (the CodeQL upload-sarif action) inside a CI workflow. It does not change the project's actual Bitcoin library code, its public interfaces, or how user funds or data are handled. There is no indication this commit fixes or introduces a security vulnerability.

Recommended action

No action required. Treat as normal dependency hygiene for CI infrastructure.

Security signals we found

No strong security signals were identified.

Risk score

Why this scored 15/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 0/30
Exploitability 0/25
Stealth signal 0/15
Affected reach 0/15
Confidence 10/10
Evidence quality 5/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.