AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Informational 15 Bitcoin

Merge rust-bitcoin/rust-bitcoin#6670: ci: fix labeller permissions

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by Andrew Poelstra

96/100 · Strong
Merge rust-bitcoin/rust-bitcoin#6670: ci: fix labeller permissions

715f2bd62fe093c5a01a28b84cf60a6ada9e9756 ci: fix labeller permissions (Nick Johnson)

Pull request description:

The labeller runs in a separate workflow for security reasons, but this forces the `download-artifact` action to need an explicit token.

Here is a test end to end run on my remote: https://github.com/nyonson/rust-bitcoin/pull/5


ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK 715f2bd62fe093c5a01a28b84cf60a6ada9e9756; successfully ran local tests; sure, whatever
satsfy:
ACK 715f2bd62fe093c5a01a28b84cf60a6ada9e9756
tcharding:
ACK 715f2bd62fe093c5a01a28b84cf60a6ada9e9756


Tree-SHA512: 3572cf7f92a1869192cbb3300b72bc2922e56e4529482d5baaddc66a47d46e42929e04ec9f0dd5b74a9f20fd72088e2f4b27a0f462ad9579016392027bf5c1e2
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Provides detailed explanatory context✓ Mentions testing or verification✓ Links an issue, advisory, or supporting reference✓ Names security-relevant behavior explicitly
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This is a routine GitHub Actions workflow fix. The change gives the automated PR labeler workflow permission to download artifacts and explicitly tells the GitHub CLI which repository to act on. It does not change the Bitcoin library code, user-facing behavior, or introduce a security vulnerability.

Recommended action

No action required; this is a benign CI maintenance patch.

Security signals we found

01

CI workflow permission fix

02

No source code changes

03

No cryptographic or consensus changes

Risk score

Why this scored 15/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 0/30
Exploitability 0/25
Stealth signal 0/15
Affected reach 0/15
Confidence 10/10
Evidence quality 5/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.