docs(relative): fix incorrect BIP 68 link in module docs
What changed, and why it matters
This commit fixes a broken documentation hyperlink. The comment that describes a Bitcoin improvement proposal (BIP 68) was accidentally pointing to the wrong BIP page (BIP 65). No program code, logic, or security behavior was changed.
No security action needed. Treat as a normal documentation fix.
Security signals we found
No strong security signals were identified.
Evidence from the diff
A single-line doc-comment URL in units/src/locktime/relative/mod.rs is corrected from bip-0065.mediawiki to bip-0068.mediawiki. The surrounding text already correctly identifies BIP 68, so this is purely a documentation typo fix. There are no code, API, or cryptographic changes.
Changed components
units/src/locktime/relative/mod.rs (documentation only)Inspect captured patch +1 / −1
diff --git a/units/src/locktime/relative/mod.rs b/units/src/locktime/relative/mod.rs
index 579bf48a..2c4f6f0b 100644
--- a/units/src/locktime/relative/mod.rs
+++ b/units/src/locktime/relative/mod.rs
@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ pub use self::error::{
///
/// # Relevant BIPs
///
-/// * [BIP 68 Relative lock-time using consensus-enforced sequence numbers](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0065.mediawiki)
+/// * [BIP 68 Relative lock-time using consensus-enforced sequence numbers](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0068.mediawiki)
/// * [BIP 112 CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0112.mediawiki)
#[derive(Debug, Clone, Copy, PartialEq, Eq, Hash)]
pub enum LockTime {
Why this scored 15/100
Community notes
Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.
The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.