Public commit record
45/100 · Thin
What the developer wrote
Authored by Fmt Bot
2025-10-19 automated rustfmt nightly
✓ Descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component! No meaningful explanatory body
What changed, and why it matters
This is an automated code-formatting commit from rustfmt. It only changes whitespace, line breaks, and brace style in two source files. No program logic, behavior, or security properties were changed.
Recommended action
No action needed; this is a formatting-only change with no security relevance.
Security signals we found
No strong security signals were identified.
Evidence from the diff
The commit applies rustfmt nightly formatting: collapsing a one-line method body, converting match arms from braced blocks to trailing-expression style, and rewrapping long array literals in tests. The diff is purely stylistic; no semantic tokens were added, removed, or reordered, and no logic paths were altered.
Changed components
consensus_encoding/src/encode/encoders.rsprimitives/src/transaction.rsInspect captured patch +23 / −34
diff --git a/consensus_encoding/src/encode/encoders.rs b/consensus_encoding/src/encode/encoders.rs
index f5d2de1f..36831623 100644
--- a/consensus_encoding/src/encode/encoders.rs
+++ b/consensus_encoding/src/encode/encoders.rs
@@ -30,9 +30,7 @@ impl<'sl> BytesEncoder<'sl> {
}
impl Encoder for BytesEncoder<'_> {
- fn current_chunk(&self) -> &[u8] {
- self.sl.unwrap_or_default()
- }
+ fn current_chunk(&self) -> &[u8] { self.sl.unwrap_or_default() }
fn advance(&mut self) -> bool {
self.sl = None;
@@ -592,10 +590,7 @@ mod tests {
// 0xFF + u64
let mut e = CompactSizeEncoder::new(0x0000_F0F0_F0F0_F0E0u64);
- assert_eq!(
- e.current_chunk(),
- &[0xFF, 0xE0, 0xF0, 0xF0, 0xF0, 0xF0, 0xF0, 0x00, 0x00][..]
- );
+ assert_eq!(e.current_chunk(), &[0xFF, 0xE0, 0xF0, 0xF0, 0xF0, 0xF0, 0xF0, 0x00, 0x00][..]);
assert!(!e.advance());
assert!(e.current_chunk().is_empty());
}
diff --git a/primitives/src/transaction.rs b/primitives/src/transaction.rs
index 79717adb..cdd63923 100644
--- a/primitives/src/transaction.rs
+++ b/primitives/src/transaction.rs
@@ -393,32 +393,27 @@ impl Decoder for TransactionDecoder {
// Still more bytes required.
return Ok(true);
}
- },
- State::Inputs(_, _, decoder) => {
+ }
+ State::Inputs(_, _, decoder) =>
if decoder.push_bytes(bytes)? {
return Ok(true);
- }
- },
- State::SegwitFlag(_) => {
+ },
+ State::SegwitFlag(_) =>
if bytes.is_empty() {
return Ok(true);
- }
- },
- State::Outputs(_, _, _, decoder) => {
+ },
+ State::Outputs(_, _, _, decoder) =>
if decoder.push_bytes(bytes)? {
return Ok(true);
- }
- },
- State::Witnesses(_, _, _, _, decoder) => {
+ },
+ State::Witnesses(_, _, _, _, decoder) =>
if decoder.push_bytes(bytes)? {
return Ok(true);
- }
- },
- State::LockTime(_, _, _, decoder) => {
+ },
+ State::LockTime(_, _, _, decoder) =>
if decoder.push_bytes(bytes)? {
return Ok(true);
- }
- },
+ },
State::Done(..) => return Ok(false),
State::Errored => panic!("call to push_bytes() after decoder errored"),
}
@@ -1719,8 +1714,8 @@ mod tests {
assert_eq!(
encoder.current_chunk(),
&[
- 32, 31, 30, 29, 28, 27, 26, 25, 24, 23, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13,
- 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1
+ 32, 31, 30, 29, 28, 27, 26, 25, 24, 23, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12,
+ 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1
][..]
);
assert!(encoder.advance());
@@ -1766,8 +1761,8 @@ mod tests {
assert_eq!(
encoder.current_chunk(),
&[
- 32, 31, 30, 29, 28, 27, 26, 25, 24, 23, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13,
- 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1
+ 32, 31, 30, 29, 28, 27, 26, 25, 24, 23, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12,
+ 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1
][..]
);
assert!(encoder.advance());
@@ -1814,8 +1809,8 @@ mod tests {
assert_eq!(
encoder.current_chunk(),
&[
- 32, 31, 30, 29, 28, 27, 26, 25, 24, 23, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13,
- 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1
+ 32, 31, 30, 29, 28, 27, 26, 25, 24, 23, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12,
+ 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1
][..]
);
assert!(encoder.advance());
@@ -1881,10 +1876,9 @@ mod tests {
assert_eq!(
encoder.current_chunk(),
&[
- 32, 31, 30, 29, 28, 27, 26, 25, 24, 23, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13,
- 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1
+ 32, 31, 30, 29, 28, 27, 26, 25, 24, 23, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12,
+ 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1
][..]
-
);
assert!(encoder.advance());
assert_eq!(encoder.current_chunk(), &[1u8, 0, 0, 0][..]);
@@ -1998,8 +1992,8 @@ mod tests {
assert_eq!(
encoder.current_chunk(),
&[
- 32, 31, 30, 29, 28, 27, 26, 25, 24, 23, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13,
- 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1
+ 32, 31, 30, 29, 28, 27, 26, 25, 24, 23, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12,
+ 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1
][..]
);
assert!(encoder.advance());
Risk score
Our methodology →Why this scored 15/100
Human-validated context
Community notes
Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.
No validated notes yet.
The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.