build(deps): bump actions/labeler from 5 to 6
What the developer wrote
Authored by dependabot[bot]
build(deps): bump actions/labeler from 5 to 6
Bumps [actions/labeler](https://github.com/actions/labeler) from 5 to 6.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/actions/labeler/releases)
- [Commits](https://github.com/actions/labeler/compare/v5...v6)
---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: actions/labeler
dependency-version: '6'
dependency-type: direct:production
update-type: version-update:semver-major
...
Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
What changed, and why it matters
This is a routine automated update by Dependabot that bumps the GitHub Actions 'labeler' workflow action from version 5 to version 6. It only affects how pull-request labels are managed and does not change any Bitcoin library code, cryptography, or user-facing behavior.
No security action required. Review the actions/labeler v6 release notes for any breaking workflow changes before merging, as with any major-version bump.
Security signals we found
No strong security signals were identified.
Evidence from the diff
The commit modifies .github/workflows/manage-pr.yml, changing the uses: line for actions/labeler from v5 to v6. This is a major-version dependency bump in a GitHub Actions workflow for PR label management. No source code, tests, or cryptographic logic in the rust-bitcoin crate is changed.
Changed components
.github/workflows/manage-pr.ymlInspect captured patch +1 / −1
diff --git a/.github/workflows/manage-pr.yml b/.github/workflows/manage-pr.yml
index eaffd087..6079baf3 100644
--- a/.github/workflows/manage-pr.yml
+++ b/.github/workflows/manage-pr.yml
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ jobs:
- name: Generate label config
run: cd master && SCAN_DIR=../merge ./contrib/gen_label_config.sh
- name: Update labels
- uses: actions/labeler@v5
+ uses: actions/labeler@v6
with:
configuration-path: master/.github/labeler.yml
sync-labels: true
Why this scored 15/100
Community notes
Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.
The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.