AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Informational 15 Bitcoin

Merge rust-bitcoin/rust-bitcoin#6736: benches: fix encoding use, add CI check, and standardize on criterion

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by Andrew Poelstra

100/100 · Strong
Merge rust-bitcoin/rust-bitcoin#6736: benches: fix encoding use, add CI check, and standardize on criterion

a71766b7feafa1c563253074eab71d12cb17b26b benches: migrate last old benchmark and consolidate on criterion only (Nick Johnson)
6618875711cb4cad5e6a162c8219e03fb78131d4 benches: add criterion to CI, update out of date benches (Nick Johnson)

Pull request description:

Extends jrakibi's work in #6735. First commit cleans up the stale code in `benches` and adds the `benches` package to CI to prevent drift in the future. Second commit migrates the only other type of benchmark in the repository to `benches` to simplify the patterns.


ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK a71766b7feafa1c563253074eab71d12cb17b26b; successfully ran local tests


Tree-SHA512: 3874c0007255ce0f8431264af1baa95d2c3c61da78298a87d169195695247e297aaafb3acb5910072d897f7fa227467aeb8d8ec87298229ed2c13fe11d7a773c
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Provides detailed explanatory context✓ Explains rationale or failure mode✓ Mentions testing or verification✓ Links an issue, advisory, or supporting reference
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This change is purely a cleanup of benchmark code. It moves the last remaining old-style benchmark into a shared benchmark package, switches the project to use the standard Criterion benchmarking library, and adds a CI check so benchmarks stay buildable. No user-facing code, cryptographic logic, or network behavior is changed.

Recommended action

No security action needed. This is a routine refactoring of benchmark infrastructure.

Security signals we found

No strong security signals were identified.

Risk score

Why this scored 15/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 0/30
Exploitability 0/25
Stealth signal 0/15
Affected reach 0/15
Confidence 10/10
Evidence quality 5/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.