AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Low 27 Monero

wizard: support key-based monero-wallet restore QR codes

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by selsta

50/100 · Thin
wizard: support key-based monero-wallet restore QR codes
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component! No meaningful explanatory body
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit adds a feature to the Monero GUI wallet that lets users scan a QR code to restore a wallet from its secret keys. The change itself is a feature addition, not a direct security fix. However, it handles extremely sensitive data (private view and spend keys) encoded in QR codes, and the parsing logic uses string operations and URI decoding that could be risky if a malformed or malicious QR code is scanned. There is no evidence in the commit of input validation beyond checking the public address format. Because private keys are involved, any weakness in parsing could have serious consequences, but the commit does not demonstrate an actual vulnerability.

Recommended action

Treat this as a feature commit requiring security review rather than an active vulnerability. Reviewers should verify that scanned secret keys are validated (length, hex encoding), that URI parsing cannot be confused by embedded special characters, that decoded values are cleared from memory promptly, and that the QR scanner cannot be tricked into treating a payment QR as a wallet-restore QR. End users should ensure they only scan wallet-restore QR codes they generated themselves and keep them private.

Security signals we found

01

Parsing of URI-encoded secret key material from QR codes

02

Manual URI/query-string parsing instead of using a hardened parser

03

Use of decodeURIComponent on untrusted QR code data

04

Only address validity is checked; secret view/spend key values are not validated

05

Private spend key exposure via QR code is a high-sensitivity operation by design

Risk score

Why this scored 27/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 5/30
Exploitability 3/25
Stealth signal 4/15
Affected reach 5/15
Confidence 7/10
Evidence quality 3/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.