AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Moderate 59 Cryptographic libraries

wallet2: check for overflow when calculating fee from weight

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by selsta

55/100 · Thin
wallet2: check for overflow when calculating fee from weight
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Names security-relevant behavior explicitly! No meaningful explanatory body
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit adds an overflow check when the Monero wallet calculates transaction fees from a transaction's weight. Before the patch, multiplying a large 'weight' value by a non-zero 'base_fee' could silently wrap around to a tiny number, potentially causing the wallet to propose an incorrect (possibly far too low) fee. The fix now throws an internal wallet error instead of silently producing a wrong result.

Recommended action

Review all callers of calculate_fee_from_weight() to confirm weight and base_fee are bounded or attacker-influenced only through controlled paths; consider adding similar overflow checks to calculate_fee() and other fee helpers; include a regression test with boundary values.

Security signals we found

01

Integer overflow in fee calculation

02

Silent arithmetic wraparound prevented

03

Wallet-internal error thrown on overflow

04

Transaction fee correctness / economic safety

Risk score

Why this scored 59/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 18/30
Exploitability 12/25
Stealth signal 8/15
Affected reach 10/15
Confidence 7/10
Evidence quality 4/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.