AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Low 42 Cryptographic libraries

wallet2: ensure daemon returns correct tx for spend proof

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by selsta

50/100 · Thin
wallet2: ensure daemon returns correct tx for spend proof
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component! No meaningful explanatory body
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit adds a safety check in Monero's wallet code when creating or verifying a 'spend proof'—a cryptographic receipt that proves you spent funds in a specific transaction. Previously, the wallet asked the daemon (network node) for a transaction by ID but did not verify that the returned transaction actually matched the requested ID. The fix throws an error if the daemon returns a different transaction than the one the wallet asked for. This could prevent a malicious or buggy daemon from tricking the wallet into generating or accepting a proof for the wrong transaction.

Recommended action

Treat as a low-to-moderate security hardening fix. Users and integrators should upgrade wallets to include this validation. Wallet operators should not rely on a single untrusted daemon for spend-proof operations without this patch. No immediate emergency response is indicated, but the fix should be included in the next release.

Security signals we found

01

Missing input validation on daemon-supplied transaction data

02

Possible wrong-transaction proof generation/verification

03

Daemon trust boundary issue in wallet2

04

Defense-in-depth hardening

Risk score

Why this scored 42/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 12/30
Exploitability 8/25
Stealth signal 7/15
Affected reach 6/15
Confidence 6/10
Evidence quality 3/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.