AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Low 35 Cryptographic libraries

take m_daemon_rpc_mutex in wallet2::get_daemon_address

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by Alhuda Khan

50/100 · Thin
take m_daemon_rpc_mutex in wallet2::get_daemon_address
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component! No meaningful explanatory body
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit fixes a thread-safety bug in the Monero wallet. A function that reads the daemon's network address (get_daemon_address) was accessing shared data without holding a lock, while other parts of the code can change that same data under a mutex. The fix adds the missing lock and makes the mutex 'mutable' so it can be locked even in functions that promise not to modify anything. In practice this could lead to race conditions such as reading a partially updated or inconsistent daemon address, which might cause the wallet to connect to the wrong node or behave unpredictably. There is no direct evidence in the commit of an exploitable security outcome such as remote code execution or theft of funds.

Recommended action

Treat as a low-to-moderate reliability/concurrency fix. Review other const accessors in wallet2 that touch daemon-related state to ensure they also hold m_daemon_rpc_mutex. No emergency response is warranted based on the diff alone, but include in the next maintenance release.

Security signals we found

01

missing lock/synchronization on shared state

02

data race on m_daemon_address

03

const-correctness fix for mutex (mutable)

04

defensive concurrency hardening

Risk score

Why this scored 35/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 8/30
Exploitability 6/25
Stealth signal 7/15
Affected reach 5/15
Confidence 6/10
Evidence quality 3/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.