AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Informational 19 Cryptographic libraries

cmake: remove static_assert check

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by tobtoht

35/100 · Opaque
cmake: remove static_assert check
✓ Descriptive subject! No meaningful explanatory body
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit removes a build-time compatibility check that tested whether the C compiler supports the modern 'static_assert' keyword. It also deletes the small test program used for that check. On its own, this change does not introduce a direct security vulnerability; it is a build-system cleanup. The main risk is that on older compilers that only support the older '_Static_assert' keyword, the build might now fail or behave differently, because the code no longer automatically defines a fallback macro. There is no evidence in the commit of an exploit or security flaw.

Recommended action

Verify that all supported build toolchains now provide a working C11 static_assert without the shim. If older compilers are still supported, consider documenting the new minimum requirement or restoring the fallback macro. No immediate security patch is indicated by this commit alone.

Security signals we found

01

Build-system-only change with no runtime code modifications

02

Removal of a compiler-feature compatibility shim

03

No mention of security, vulnerability, CVE, or researcher attribution in commit message or diff

04

Potential for build breakage or changed behavior on compilers lacking C11 static_assert

Risk score

Why this scored 19/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 2/30
Exploitability 1/25
Stealth signal 1/15
Affected reach 3/15
Confidence 8/10
Evidence quality 4/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.