AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Informational 19 Bitcoin

mod: bump sqldb to v1.0.13

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by yyforyongyu

68/100 · Adequate
mod: bump sqldb to v1.0.13

Bump only the require version for github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/sqldb
from v1.0.11 to v1.0.13. The local replace directive (=> ./sqldb) is
kept on purpose, so lnd itself continues to build against the in-tree
sqldb package on the release branch -- no behavioral change here.

The important part is downstream module resolution. Go does not
propagate replace directives from dependencies, so downstream consumers
of lnd only see the require version. Before this bump, they could
resolve an older tagged sqldb that did not contain the current
release-branch sqlc types and migrations, causing build failures.

The new sqldb/v1.0.13 tag was created from the v0.21 release-branch
commit that contains the same sqldb code lnd currently uses via the
local replace. Downstream consumers now fetch a tagged module matching
the release branch; the replace will be dropped in a follow-up cleanup.
✓ Descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Provides detailed explanatory context
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This is a routine Go module version bump in a build configuration file (go.mod). It changes the declared dependency version for an internal sub-module so that downstream projects compiling against lnd fetch a matching tagged release. The commit explicitly states there is no behavioral change in lnd itself, because a local replace directive still forces lnd to use its own in-tree copy of the code. There is no indication of a security fix or vulnerability.

Recommended action

No security action required. Treat as normal build/maintenance dependency metadata update.

Security signals we found

No strong security signals were identified.

Risk score

Why this scored 19/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 0/30
Exploitability 0/25
Stealth signal 0/15
Affected reach 5/15
Confidence 9/10
Evidence quality 5/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.