CommitWatch RSS
AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Low 27 Bitcoin

mod: bump prometheus client dependency

LL8b7ededa View source ↗
Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by ziggie

68/100 · Adequate
mod: bump prometheus client dependency

Bump the direct Prometheus client_golang dependency to v1.23.2 and let
MVS select the newer common, procfs, and client_model modules required
by that release.

The newer Prometheus graph no longer references
github.com/prometheus/common v0.4.1, which was the remaining path that
caused go mod tidy to retain the github.com/gogo/protobuf v1.1.1 go.mod
checksum after removing the redundant gogo/protobuf replace.
✓ Descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Provides detailed explanatory context
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit updates the Prometheus metrics library and several related Go module dependencies to newer versions. It is a routine dependency maintenance change, not a code-level security fix. The commit message does not describe any specific vulnerability being patched, and the diff only changes dependency version pins in go.mod and go.sum. While newer dependency versions can indirectly improve security by removing old, potentially vulnerable transitive packages, there is no direct evidence in the commit that this fixes a known security issue.

Recommended action

Treat as routine dependency hygiene. Review the Prometheus client_golang v1.23.2 release notes and the release notes of upgraded transitive modules for any security advisories. If running LND, include this change in normal patch management but do not prioritize it as an urgent security fix unless additional advisory information is provided.

Security signals we found

01

Dependency version bump of Prometheus client_golang from v1.11.1 to v1.23.2

02

Removal of old transitive dependencies including matttproud/golang_protobuf_extensions and stale gogo/protobuf v1.1.1 checksum path

03

No vendor disclosure of a specific CVE or security issue in commit message or diff

Risk score

Why this scored 27/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 5/30
Exploitability 5/25
Stealth signal 5/15
Affected reach 5/15
Confidence 5/10
Evidence quality 2/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.

More from LND

Related watches

Moderate 62 AI analysisMessage 58 · Thin
LL Lightning LabsLND BitcoinLightning Network

Merge pull request #11212 from ziggie1984/disable-legacy-channels

This change stops LND from opening new Lightning channels using the old 'legacy' commitment format. The legacy format makes it harder to recover funds if something goes wrong, because the money owed to you is tied to a secret key that chan…

Prevents opening new channels with the legacy commitment type, whose tweaked to_remote output complicates data-loss recoveryCloses a negotiation path where an empty channel_type TLV bypassed feature checks and forced a legacy channelAdds explicit RPC and wire rejection with a dedicated error code
112cb5f3by ziggieXXX+265−4716 files
Vendor flagged security relevance
Open full analysis →Source commit ↗
Moderate 56 AI analysisMessage 73 · Adequate
LL Lightning LabsLND BitcoinLightning Network

Merge pull request #11223 from gijswijs/legacy-dust-retribution-fix

This update fixes a bug in how LND handles old-style punishment transactions when a channel partner tries to cheat. Previously, tiny (dust) HTLCs were left as blank placeholder entries in the punishment data, which could cause the node to …

nil-pointer dereference risk in breach retribution pathlegacy revocation log handling inconsistency with modern formatdefensive hardening added for trimmed/dust HTLCs
500ca51fby ziggieXXX+168−146 files
No security note in commit
Open full analysis →Source commit ↗
Moderate 62 AI analysisMessage 73 · Adequate
LL Lightning LabsLND BitcoinLightning Network

Merge pull request #11190 from Roasbeef/zpay32-reject-duplicate-payment-hashes

This change tightens how LND reads Lightning invoices (BOLT 11). Previously, if an invoice contained more than one payment hash field, LND would silently keep the first one and ignore the rest. Now it rejects the invoice entirely. The rele…

Behavior change from 'use first duplicate field' to 'reject duplicate fields'New error type ErrDuplicatePaymentHash returned on duplicate payment hash fieldsMalformed/unsupported-length duplicate payment hash now treated as duplicate and rejected
86306f89by Yong+147−106 files
No security note in commit
Open full analysis →Source commit ↗