AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Informational 15 Bitcoin

ci: add automated backport workflow

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by ziggie

80/100 · Strong
ci: add automated backport workflow

This commit introduces an automated GitHub Actions workflow to streamline
the backporting process for merged PRs from master to release branches.

Key features:
- Triggers on merged PRs with labels matching 'backport-v*' pattern
(e.g., backport-v0.20.x-branch)
- Validates that target branches exist before attempting backport
- Creates separate backport PRs for each target branch
- Automatically adds 'no-changelog' label to backport PRs
- Handles merge conflicts by creating draft PRs with conflict markers
- Supports multiple simultaneous backports via multiple labels

Workflow steps:
1. Checkout repository with full git history
2. Validate all target branches exist in the remote repository
3. For each valid backport label:
- Create a new branch (backport-<pr-num>-to-<target-branch>)
- Cherry-pick commits from the master PR
- Create a new PR targeting the release branch
- Link back to the original PR
4. If conflicts occur, create a draft PR for manual resolution

Label format:
- Valid: backport-v0.20.x-branch, backport-v0.19.x-branch
- Invalid: backport candidate, backport-candidate, backport-needed

This automation reduces manual work and ensures consistency in the
backporting process while maintaining full visibility and control
for maintainers.
✓ Descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Uses a recognizable type or scope✓ Provides detailed explanatory context
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit adds a GitHub Actions automation script that helps developers copy approved code changes from the main development branch to older release branches. It is purely a process improvement for maintainers and does not change any wallet, networking, or cryptographic code in the LND application itself.

Recommended action

No security action is required. As a routine hardening suggestion, maintainers may periodically review the pinned backport-action hash and its release notes, ensure branch protection rules on release branches still require the usual review/CI checks, and confirm that the GITHUB_TOKEN permissions are scoped only to what the workflow needs.

Security signals we found

No strong security signals were identified.

Risk score

Why this scored 15/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 0/30
Exploitability 0/25
Stealth signal 0/15
Affected reach 0/15
Confidence 10/10
Evidence quality 5/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.