AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Informational 21 Bitcoin

github: bump gateway code-review to v0.4.4 (#10926)

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by Suheb

81/100 · Strong
github: bump gateway code-review to v0.4.4 (#10926)

Bump the gateway-action pin to v0.4.4 (abe7cf8) and the runtime_ref to
gateway v0.4.4 (20675fc), and drop the hardcoded installation_id. As of
v0.4.4 the runtime resolves the App installation covering this repo from
app_id/private_key, so a static (and easily wrong-org) id is no longer
needed.
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Provides detailed explanatory context✓ Links an issue, advisory, or supporting reference
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit updates a GitHub Actions workflow that runs an automated code-review bot called 'gateway'. It bumps the bot's version from v0.4.3 to v0.4.4 and removes a hardcoded numeric 'installation_id'. The new version figures out the correct installation ID automatically from the app's credentials. The change is a routine dependency/maintenance update for a CI/CD automation tool, not a fix for a known vulnerability in the LND software itself.

Recommended action

No immediate action required. Treat as routine CI maintenance. If reviewing for security, verify the new gateway-action SHA (abe7cf8) and runtime_ref SHA (20675fc) correspond to the officially released v0.4.4 artifacts from Lightning Labs, and confirm the GATEWAY_APP_ID and GATEWAY_PRIVATE_KEY secrets are scoped only to this repository/organization.

Security signals we found

01

Hardcoded installation_id removed, reducing risk of using a wrong-organization GitHub App installation

02

Action and runtime pinned to immutable commit SHAs (supply-chain best practice maintained)

03

No changes to LND runtime, wallet, channel, or network code

Risk score

Why this scored 21/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 2/30
Exploitability 3/25
Stealth signal 4/15
Affected reach 3/15
Confidence 6/10
Evidence quality 3/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.